A Letter to the New Owner of the Packard

Ms. Charbonneau,

Some 12 years ago you received a gift that had been beloved in our family for some 26 years. I went with my dad to pick up the Packard from a person who was selling it in 1986. It was originally black, but it received a magnificent and factory-standard Packard cream paint job. I waited with him over several months to find and re-chrome the letters on the front and side. I watched the car come together to perfection over a few years. Once the car was perfect, he loved to take it out and just drive wherever. I remember being in the passenger seat with him, seeing him laugh, enjoying the gentle thrill of bringing it to rest at each Stop sign with those original-style drum brakes! He loved driving it whenever he could. He brought it to the Hildene Car Show in Manchester, Vermont once… maybe twice which was enjoyable. But what he really loved was driving it around town.

My dad loved the car for the personal history and aspirations that it represented. When he was young, he admired that model but couldn’t afford it. Thirty years later, he could! There are other reasons he loved it. Some of those reasons he told me and I’ve forgotten, and some, I’m sure, were impossible to articulate in the first place.

After more than 25 years of caring for the Packard, he was, of course, melancholy at selling it. But it was time. He had fewer opportunities to take it out because he and my mom were splitting their time between living in New Jersey and Florida. And even when he was in New Jersey, where the car was garaged, it only came out on special occasions. And there was the nuisance that he was about to lose the garage due to some upcoming HOA rules changes.

He loved that car!

The background image on his computer for some ten years was of my sister, his granddaughter, and I washing the car in our driveway on a summer day. I’d ask him every now and then if he wanted to update the photo and he’d laugh, pause a moment and say, “Nah! Leave it there. I like it!”

I don’t know you at all but my dad told me that the ’51 Packard had been your dream car for a long time. I’m glad, and my dad was glad that you appreciated the car.

I’m writing to tell you that my dad passed away last April. I don’t know what that might even mean to you but I thought you should know.

I want to thank you for your appreciation. We all know that the car is just a thing, but what it represents in each of our hearts runs deep and true.

Best regards,
Lee C. Sonko

Packard Update

In the search for Chantal Charbonneau the 3rd owner of what used to be my dad’s 1951 Packard, my friend Shara pointed out this great article about her and her relationship with the car.

Montreal woman buys a ’51 Packard for her 51st birthday
Montreal woman has had a life-long love affair with Packards
by Alyn Edwards
Published Nov 10, 2014 • Last updated May 19, 2021 • 4 minute read

For the past 23 years, Chantal Charbonneau has been editor of the Musée d’art contemporain de Montréal, an institution that celebrates its 50th anniversary this year in the heart of Montreal’s Quartier des Spectacles. She has produced hundreds of publications and videos, some of which have earned the Musée distinguished awards.

With a master’s degree in art history from the University of Montreal, Chantal has always had a keen interest in items from the past including a fondness for “rolling sculptures of yesteryear.” She refers to these as beautés mobiles as she has a long-standing personal connection with antique vehicles.

She was barely three months old in 1962 when her father went out shopping for food and came home with an unexpected item: a massive black 1940 Packard Super Eight, to her mom’s astonishment. The man loved classic cars and would own more than a dozen Packard cars in subsequent years, several of which he restored himself.

Chantal Charbonneau’s 1951 Packard 250 convertible acquired as a present to herself for her 51st birthday.

Chantal grew up taking Sunday drives in her dad’s old Packard classics. With her parents and siblings, she attended many car shows in Canada and the U.S. At age 17, she learned to drive on their 1951 Packard Patrician 400, an elegant sedan painted Argentine Gray. She vowed to have her own Packard someday.

Last year, she and companion Michel were attending the famous Pebble Beach Concours d’Elegance when an e-alert from Trovit popped up on her computer. The sight of a hot 1951 Packard 250 Convertible advertised for sale in New Jersey got her excited. It was painted period-correct Corona Cream, her favourite colour for that model.

“Where I live on the South Shore of Montreal is seven hours from where the vehicle was in New Jersey. But to make things more complicated, we were much farther away, in California at the time,” she recalls.

Article content
After learning from the seller on the phone that his Packard showing just 37,000 original miles on the odometer had been thoroughly restored in 1988 as a barn find near Buffalo, New York, Chantal and Michel rushed to the local post office in Carmel to mail a deposit, hoping to lock in the deal.

Chantal Charbonneau drives her 1951 Packard 250 convertible.

Although the Packard Motor Car Company grew to produce one of the most luxurious marques in the U.S., the company’s fortunes declined following World War II. By 1950, Packard sales had become moribund because of a stale 1940s design. But a complete redrawing for the sleek new 1951 models, known as Series 24, made them more stylish and contemporary, resulting in a phenomenal, albeit temporary, sales rebound.

Production of only 42,000 cars in 1950 was trumped by more than 100,000 units flooding out of Packard dealerships in 1951. Once a vehicle for celebrities and the wealthy during the ’20s and ’30s, the marque was made famous by its advertising slogan: Ask the man who owns one.

Chantal’s Packard 250 convertible is one of fewer than 2,400 such rag tops built in 1951, representing just 4% of the company’s production that year. It is equipped with a 155-horsepower flathead straight-eight engine, Ultramatic transmission and power everything: steering, brakes, aerial, seat, windows and top. The ivory and deep red interior is sporty and inviting.

Chantal Charbonneau with the 1951 Packard 250 convertible purchased to celebrate her 51st birthday.

Packard experts and friends John and BarbaraAnna Kefalonitis, who live in New Jersey, generously offered to trailer Chantal’s “new” car to Plattsburgh, N.Y., just south of the Quebec border, following its purchase in August 2013. Ironically, this was soon after Chantal’s 51st birthday and exactly 51 years after her father had bought his first Packard.

As the third owner of this rare model, Chantal got behind the wheel, drove it through Canada Customs at night and then home to the Montreal suburb of Saint-Lambert. “I felt as comfortable doing this as I would sitting on a plush sofa in my living room,” she says.

Typically, when she arrives home from work on a Friday night when weather permits, she takes the Packard out for a spin to the local shopping centre. She loves driving her car as opposed to letting it sit idle like a big fancy trinket.

Her passion has led to a lot of reading, research and publishing on the subject, as well as becoming one of only a handful of female judges at several Concours d’Elegance shows of prized classics in Canada and the U.S.

Chantal Charbonneau with their 1930 Packard Phaeton Touring in 1980.

Some time ago, she stumbled upon her family’s 1951 Packard Patrician 400 that she had learned to drive on 35 years ago. It is stored in a barn north of Montreal. Although it is in poor condition, she hopes to bring it back to life someday.

On her bucket list of must-do events for next year is the Euro Packard Meeting in Studen, Switzerland, where she has been invited by the Chairman of the organizing committee.

Her role model is car collector friend, business woman and philanthropist Margaret Dunning of Plymouth, Michigan. At 104 years of age, the “Belle of the Concours”, as she is known, still drives her 1930 Packard Straight Eight 740 convertible. The two recently spent time together at the 2014 Cobble Beach Concours d’Elegance near Owen Sound, Ont., trading notes about their Packard cars.

There is no doubt that Miss Charbonneau plans to dedicate the rest of her driving days singing the praises of her iconic Packard: “A trip in a ’50s car such as this provides a voyage in time with every ride, not to mention a special link with my own family history,” she says. “You get a lot of interesting comments, but people always seem stunned to see a woman at the wheel of a vintage automobile, which amuses me no end.”

If this sounds like a lot of fun, ask the woman who owns one!

Alyn Edwards is a classic car enthusiast and partner in Peak Communicators, a Vancouver-based public relations company. aedwards@peakco.com

Burning Man Reselling Ticket Prices Fixed!

Woo hoo, I did that!

(previously)

In the San Francisco Standard
Burning Man ticket resale overcharging issue has buyers irate
The event’s official platform overcharged buyers, sparking fury and an eventual refund.

…When STEP opened in mid-May, Tixel’s resale fees included a 9% “Live Entertainment” tax required by the state of Nevada. For tickets originally purchased for $750 with fees, that amounted to nearly $70. However, the original ticket sale also charged the 9%, meaning a buyer was being taxed twice.

After inquiries from The Standard, the Burning Man organization confirmed that Tixel had “accidentally charged” the tax and “is in the process of refunding” it to buyers….

 

 

Nevada Live Entertainment Tax for Reselling Burning Man Tickets

I’m trying to get rid of 2 extra tickets I have for Burning Man. I was trying to sell them using the official Burning Man reseller program called STEP and I noticed the fees charged by the middleman, Tixel.com were quite steep. Most notably, Tixel was adding an $80 Nevada Live Entertainment Tax (LET) to the price of the ticket. Since I already paid that tax when buying it, it seemed wrong that they were adding it again!

I’ve been leaning in and it gets complicated.

The current law and Nevada SB 431 either requires or doesn’t require that the LET be charged by the initial seller AND all resellers. Are you a legislative lawyer that wants to help out the Burner community? Figure out how much Tixel.com needs to charge!

In the meantime, Tixel removed the LET fee… in apparent response to my emailing them about it!!

The checkout screen from yesterday

The checkout screen today

 

In a related issue, they were charging the 9% Nevada Live Entertainment Tax on the entire $895 listing price even though that $895 includes several fees that are not part of the ticket price. The ticket cost me $750 + $30 delivery fee + $135 Nevada Live Entertainment Tax + $67 credit card processing. Those fees aren’t supposed to get double-taxed-again on the second resell. So that’s got to get figured out.

 

Do you want to buy my Burning Man Tickets? Buy them on Tixel here or message me and we’ll figure out to trust one another on the internet and save $214 $130 per ticket.

 

 


I’m happy I get to update my original listing for my ticket!

Selling 2 $750 tickets at our cost.

In our panic to get tickets, my wife and I both bought tickets to that thing in the desert. Please buy our extras. 2 tickets at the $750 level, selling for what we paid, $870.48 each. No car pass, sorry.

Here’s my Tixel listing but don’t buy from those bastards! The listing shows how I listed at $895.68 (I aimed for us to split the Tixel $50 listing fee) but a few clicks later you’ll be paying $1084.81 for the ticket https://tixel.com/u/3693633 . Screw those guys!

PM me. We can figure out how to trust one another on the phone to save $214 $130 per ticket.

My GoConfirm code: L72T

Michael Geier’s post on the topic

“…Important Update for Burning Man Ticket Buyers via Tixel / STEP ????

It looks like Tixel has quietly removed the 9% Nevada Live Entertainment Tax (LET) from current Burning Man ticket resales….”

 

Screenshot

and my response on FB:

Holy shit! That was me! I’ve been talking to them over the last few days about being double-taxed with the Nevada Live Entertainment Tax! They didn’t reach out to me specifically about removing the LET but my messages, apparently, got them thinking!
I’m continuing to research it right now and I’m gonna tell you, reading the existing and proposed law is hard and MIND NUMBING (and not in a good way!) My first thought is that it’s important to not be too harsh on Tixel, but we’ve got to figure out the law together. As I’ve been reading the current and proposed law this morning, I’ve flip-flopped several times, alternately thinking that the current law says that any reseller is required to charge the excise tax (which is an insane, state mandated double-tax), or maybe not.
It would be great if a Burner legislative lawyer-type could look over this and offer guidance! Here’s a proposed bill that has the text of the current law baked into it: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/83rd2025/Bills/SB/SB431_R1.pdf

Email Falling To Spam

Today, a friend emailed me from their personal domain name and it fell into my spam folder because their DMARC isn’t configured correctly. That reminded me of my own history of spam problems at Lee.org. (previously)
I gave up on trying to run my own email (via Dreamhost.com) a few years ago because even though I had all the elements right, my outgoing emails kept falling into people’s spam folders. Today, I pay $6/month to Google Workspace and $180/year to BoomerangForGmail to make sure my emails reach their destination. These days, I’ve got one person I email where my emails from Lee.org regularly fall into his spam folder, he has a comcast email address.

Summer Wildflowers

It is summer and the wildflowers in my front yard are off the hook!

Buy 2 Burning Man Tickets!

I’m selling 2 Burning Man tickets (no car pass) at our cost, $870 each. Message me!

 

In our panic to get tickets, my wife and I both bought tickets to that thing in the desert. Please buy our extras. 2 tickets at the $750 level, selling for what we paid with all the fees, $870.48 each. No car pass, sorry.

Here’s my Tixel listing but don’t buy from those bastards! The listing shows how I listed at $895.68 (I aimed for us to split the Tixel $50 listing fee) but a few clicks later you’ll be paying $1084.81 for the ticket https://tixel.com/u/3693633. Screw those guys!

PM me. We can figure out how to trust one another on the phone to save $200 per ticket.

My GoConfirm code: L72T

GoConfirm is apparently a new way to verify a person’s identity. They are using it on the Burning Man Tickets and Vehicle Pass Exchange FB group.

Played 7 Wonders and Liar’s Dice, Raiders of the North Sea

Last night I played 7 Wonders at Monday night gaming.

It’s very complicated.

I suppose I mostly understood how to play by the end of the game but not really why. It’s 90% me vs. the cards I randomly get. And nothing seemed to “happen” during the game until we tallied the score at the very end.

Scoring is so complicated. I made most of my choices based on “ooh, that’s a pretty card, I’ll choose that one.” and I scored in the middle of the pack at the end of the game. So many of the “strategic” choices come down to whether luck will favor me getting the right cards. There are just so many ways to score victory points that it all evens out in the end.

I’ve also got to admit that I was distracted the entire evening due to some personal issues. So maybe the game is actually better than I experienced.


The night opened with a rousing game of Abducktion. I was too late to get in, but fun was had.

At the end of the night, we played a little round of Liars Dice. Such a simple game, but ultimately rather satisfying!


Last week at Community Games Night, I played Raiders of the North Sea again. Despite learning it just last month, I had mostly forgotten how to play. I ultimately played a bit better than the last time but quickly remembered that I would rather be playing directly with other players (either with or against); I’m playing mostly against my cards and the board. It was fine, the pictures are pretty.

 

 

Played at Monday Night Gaming: Arcs: Conflict and Collapse in the Reach

Last night at Monday Night Gaming, I got to play Arcs: Conflict and Collapse in the Reach. It’s a complex, very nice game! By the end of 2 1/2 hours of gameplay, we were officially 3/5 of the way through a game and I was still figuring out rules, but it was fun! And a very good group to play with, teaming up with Kevin against Arthur will always be a thing. And Arthur will still always win ;-)

Kevin getting a shot of me getting shredded by my own attack on Arthur’s blue ships

Prenatal Nitric Oxide May Increase Incidence of Autism

There’s growing evidence that prenatal exposure to nitric oxide increases the incidence of autism in children, maybe 1.4 times. Nitric oxide is found in engine exhaust, natural gas stoves, tobacco smoke, and smog.

In April, RFK Jr. made it a top priority to identify the causes of autism. I wonder how the discussion will go: RFK Jr to Trump, “Fossil fuel exhaust causes autism! To make America Healthy Again, you should encourage renewable energy, electric cars, electric stoves, and discourage smoking!”
Trump, “Since taking office, I made executive orders doing exactly the opposite on each of those fronts.” (which is true) “So here’s what I’m going to do…”

Sources: